jobs.ac.uk - Great jobs for bright people
  • Find a Job
  • Find PhDs
  • Career Advice
  • Jobs by Email
  • Advertise a Job
  • Recruiters
  • Your Account

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

career-advice.jobs.ac.uk

Secondary Sidebar

jobs.ac.uk Career Advice

  • CV and Cover Letter Advice
    • CV Tips
    • Free CV Templates
    • Cover Letters with Examples
    • Personal Profiles
    • CV Resources
  • Jobseeking and Interview Tips
    • Jobseeking Tips
    • Academic Interviews
    • Professional Interviews
    • Jobseeking and Interview Resources
  • Career Development
    • Academic Careers
    • Research Careers
    • Career Progression Stories
    • Professional Careers
    • Working in Industry
    • Career Development Resources
    • Global Careers
    • Working From Home
  • Women in Higher Education
  • FE Career Advice
    • FE CV & Interview Tips
    • Working in FE
    • Managing your Career in FE
    • FE Jobs Profiles
  • Resources
    • Academic Case Studies
    • Professional Case Studies
    • Job Profiles
      • Biological Science Jobs
      • Health and Medical Jobs
      • Engineering and Technology Jobs
      • Computer Science Jobs
      • Physical and Environmental Science Jobs
      • Professional Service Jobs
        • Business Development Manager Jobs Profile
        • Chef Jobs Profile
        • Civil Service Jobs Profile
        • Email Marketing Jobs Profile
        • SEO Jobs Profile
        • Office Admin Jobs
    • Vlogs
  • Webinars
  • Country Profiles
    • Africa
      • Egypt
      • Ghana
      • Kenya
      • Nigeria
      • South Africa
    • Americas
      • Canada
      • United States of America
    • Asia
      • Bahrain
      • Brunei
      • China
      • Hong Kong
      • India
      • Japan
      • Kazakhstan
      • Malaysia
      • Qatar
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Dubai
      • Singapore
      • South Korea
      • Turkey
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Work in Vietnam – Country Profile
      • Work in Uzbekistan – Country Profile
    • Europe
      • Belgium
      • Denmark
      • Finland
      • France
      • Germany
      • Ireland
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Norway
      • Russia
      • Spain
      • Sweden
      • Switzerland
      • United Kingdom
    • Oceania
      • Australia
      • New Zealand
  • PhD and Studentship Advice
    • PhD
    • Studentship Resources
    • Vlogs
  • Need help advertising a job?
  • About jobs.ac.uk
  • Ask A Professional
  • Academic Spotlight Interviews
  • Menu
    • CV and Cover Letter Advice
      • CV Tips
      • Free CV Templates
      • Cover Letters with Examples
      • Personal Profiles
      • CV Resources
    • Jobseeking and Interview Tips
      • Jobseeking Tips
      • Academic Interviews
      • Professional Interviews
      • Jobseeking and Interview Resources
    • Career Development
      • Academic Careers
      • Career Progression Stories
      • Research Careers
      • Professional Careers
      • Working in Industry
      • Career Development Resources
      • Global Careers
      • Working From Home
    • Women in Higher Education
    • FE Career Advice
      • FE CV & Interview Tips
      • Working in FE
      • Managing your Career in FE
      • FE Jobs Profiles
    • Resources
      • Academic Case Studies
      • Professional Case Studies
      • Interview questions tool
      • Vlogs
      • Job Profiles
        • Biological Science Jobs
        • Health and Medical Jobs
        • Engineering and Technology Jobs
        • Computer Science Jobs
        • Physical and Environmental Science Jobs
        • Professional Service Jobs
        • Civil Service jobs
    • Webinars
    • Country Profiles
      • Africa
        • Work in Egypt – Country Profile
        • Work in Ghana – Country Profile
        • Work in Kenya – Country Profile
        • Work in Nigeria – Country Profile
        • Work in South Africa – Country Profile
      • Americas
        • Work in Canada – Country Profile
        • Work in the United States of America – Country Profile
      • Asia
        • Work in Bahrain – Country Profile
        • Work in Brunei – Country Profile
        • Work in China – Country Profile
        • Work in Hong Kong – Country Profile
        • Work in India – Country Profile
        • Work in Japan – Country Profile
        • Work in Kazakhstan – Country Profile
        • Work in Malaysia – Country Profile
        • Work in Qatar – Country Profile
        • Work in Saudi Arabia – Country Profile
        • Work in Singapore – Country Profile
        • Work in South Korea – Country Profile
        • Work in Turkey – Country Profile
        • Work in United Arab Emirates – Country Profile
      • Dubai
      • Europe
        • Belgium Country Profile
        • Work in Denmark – Country Profile
        • Work in Finland – Country Profile
        • France Country Profile
        • Work in Germany – Country Profile
        • Work in Ireland – Country Profile
        • Work in Italy – Country Profile
        • Work in the Netherlands – Country Profile
        • Work in Norway – Country Profile
        • Work in Russia – Country Profile
        • Work in Spain – Country Profile
        • Work in Sweden – Country Profile
        • Work in Switzerland – Country Profile
        • Work in the United Kingdom – Country Profile
      • Oceania
        • Work in Australia – Country profile
        • Work in New Zealand – Country Profile
    • Studentship Advice
      • PhD
      • Studentship Resources
      • Vlogs
    • Need help advertising a job?
    • About jobs.ac.uk

How to deal with an apparently unhelpful review

How to deal with an apparently unhelpful review

If it hasn’t haHow to deal with an apparently unhelpful reviewppened to you yet, it will: you submit a manuscript for publication and get back a peer review that leaves you feeling frustrated. “This review doesn’t help me at all! It’s wrong! You complain, “how could a reviewer ever think that?”

Our peer review system works well, overall. But reviewers are human, just like the rest of us – so even the very best of them make mistakes, or have bad days. So you will get that seemingly unhelpful review. What then?

Step one: wait. Do not write the quick, snappy response that you want to. Instead, put the review away and don’t look at it again for at least a day or two. No matter how dispassionate we like to think we are, we’re human, and humans just aren’t good at weighing the merits of criticism on first receipt. If you really feel the need to vent, write something outside your e-mail program so you can’t send it by accident, and then delete it.

Step two: ask yourself whether the review really is unhelpful. Are you sure it’s really wrong? It might be, but you should seriously consider the possibility that you’re overreacting to some unfortunate phrasing cloaking a review that’s actually right. All of us overreact this way. I overreact almost every time I read a review, and if I didn’t watch myself, I’d dismiss every helpful criticism and my work would never improve. Set yourself a high bar for concluding if a review is unhelpful or wrong.

Step three: decide what kind of unhelpful you’re looking at. There are (at least) four different ways a review can be unhelpful, or inappropriate:
a) The reviewer mounts ad hominem attacks (criticises you rather than the manuscript).
b) The reviewer makes comments that suggest a conflict of interest.
c) The reviewer makes criticisms that are factually incorrect.
d) The reviewer makes criticisms that suggest they didn’t read the manuscript carefully.
Don’t rely only on your own judgement here: discuss the review with a colleague who isn’t involved with the manuscript, and who can be frank with you about it.

Step four: mount an appropriate response.

(a) The ad hominem review.

Personal attacks in a review are unprofessional. Ideally, you’d never see them because they’re redacted by an editor; but they aren’t always. If you do get reviewer comments of this sort, your Response to Reviews document should ignore the attacks. It should, though, answer all the substantive criticisms that accompany the ad hominem ones – the latter don’t earn you a free pass from the former. You can (and maybe should) send a separate note to the editor, explaining that you ignored the ad hominem attacks and were surprised they weren’t redacted. Think of this side letter as a contribution to improving our reviewing culture. If you’re an early-career author, you might prefer to ask a supervisor or mentor to send this message in your stead.

(b) The conflict-of-interest review.

This is the rarest type. It’s also the hardest to be sure of: most often, a review you think exhibits conflict of interest will be unsigned, and people’s attempts to guess the identities of anonymous reviewers mostly misfire. But if you’re sure, a conflict-of-interest review should be handled the same way as an ad hominem one.

(c) The factually-wrong review.

This is the easiest to deal with, but don’t let that make you cavalier. Your Response to Reviews should explain clearly and dispassionately what the reviewer got wrong, ideally backed up with citations. This is not a time to scold. Sure, the reviewer “should know” that cork oaks are evergreen, or that parametric ANOVA is robust to violations of its normality assumption. But saying so will only antagonise someone who could otherwise be your ally. Besides: do you want to restrict the audience for your paper to people who know all the things you think they should? Or would you rather let the reviewer’s mistake help you reach others who go similarly astray? Here’s a good response: “Reviewer #2 suggests that my interpretation doesn’t hold because X. Actually, X is incorrect (brief explanation and citation); but because I suspect other readers may have the same worry, I’ve revised the manuscript to address the issue at line xxx)”. You may think it’s unlikely that any other reader could misunderstand as terribly as the reviewer did. But you’re probably wrong; and even if you’re right, there’s nothing to be gained by pointing it out.

(d) The didn’t-read-it review.

After this review, you’ll be tempted to complain to the editor about the reviewer not doing their job. Don’t. Complaining won’t improve your paper – but a little reflection on why the reviewer didn’t read it thoroughly just might. After all, most reviewers approach a manuscript with the intent to read carefully. If they didn’t, perhaps your manuscript is less compelling than you’d like. If you’re losing reviewers, you’ll definitely lose readers! So think about what the reviewer didn’t read (or didn’t understand, or didn’t remember), and ask why. Did your organisation hide important material? Did your turgid writing make their eyes glaze over? Did you test their patience with three paragraphs where one would have done? Then sprinkle your Response to Reviews with bits like “Reviewer #2 thought X was a problem. Actually, I had explained why X is correct (lines xxx-yyy), but some poor organisation made that easy for a reader to miss. I’ve revised to make this more obvious”. Even if you don’t really think it was your fault, you’ve got nothing to lose and much to gain by pretending that you do.

All this advice has a couple of common threads. First: reviewers and editors are human. They make mistakes and have failings just like all of us. Second: with the right attitude to revision, the apparently unhelpful review is really a useful opportunity. Reviewers, in all their humanity, capture possible reactions of real readers – who are, after all, human too. A reviewer’s fumble can help you reach even those readers who might read you carelessly, or who have imperfect knowledge of your field. Those readers matter too.

For more advice in your academic career see:

  • Top tips for academic mentoring
  • Three key tips for successful grant-writing
  • Using storytelling in teaching
  • Research in Academic Careers

What did you think of our article? - please rate

0 / 5. 0


Share this article

Dr. Stephen Heard

Dr. Stephen Heard is an evolutionary ecologist and Professor of Biology at the University of New Brunswick in Canada. He is the author of The Scientist’s Guide to Writing and of Charles Darwin’s Barnacle and David Bowie’s Spider. He blogs about academia, science and many other things at Scientist Sees Squirrel, or you can find him on Twitter as @StephenBHeard.

Reader Interactions

You may also like:

  • Audience at the conference hall.

    Writing Abstracts for Conferences

  • Supporting Individual Researchers in a Publish-or-Perish Culture

    Supporting Individual Researchers in a Publish-or-Perish Culture

  • Quiet Mornings with a Tea

    How to stay calm for your PhD defence

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

two × 1 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Follow us

Searching for a job in the United Kingdom

Latest Jobs

  • PhD Studentship: Quantifying Raindrop-Freezing Fragmentation Using a Cloud Chamber and Numerical Modelling

    Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester

    Location: Manchester

    Salary: £19,237 for 2024/25 with and extra £1000 RTSG per annum. We expect the stipend to increase each year


  • Senior Scientific Associate, Pre-clinical Genome Editing Facility (12 months Fixed Term)

    Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge

    Location: Cambridge

    Salary: £35,116 - £45,413 per annum


  • Senior Research Fellow

    College of Social Sciences - School of Social Policy and Society, University of Birmingham

    Location: Birmingham

    Salary: £57,422 - £66,537 Grade: 9


  • Housekeeping Assistant

    Trinity Hall , University of Cambridge

    Location: Cambridge

    Salary: £12.77 per hour, plus pension and benefits


  • Energy Manager

    CUEL, Coventry University Group (CUG)

    Location: Coventry

    Salary: £43,030 - £63,947


  • Clinical Innovation Fellow (2 posts available)

    College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences - MVLS College Services, University of Glasgow

    Location: Glasgow

    Salary: £48,288 - £91,753 depending on experience


Footer

jobs.ac.uk - Great jobs for bright people
  • Find a Job
  • Find PhDs
  • Career Advice
  • Jobs by Email
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility Statement

Copyright © jobs.ac.uk 1998 - 2025

  • Find a Job
  • Find PhDs
  • Careers Advice
  • Jobs by Email
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility
jobs.ac.uk - Great jobs for bright people

Copyright © jobs.ac.uk 1998 - 2025